{"id":2748,"date":"2009-04-13T13:16:55","date_gmt":"2009-04-13T18:16:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/granades.com\/?p=2748"},"modified":"2009-04-13T14:07:17","modified_gmt":"2009-04-13T19:07:17","slug":"twitter-is-for-transmitting-outrage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/granades.com\/?p=2748","title":{"rendered":"Twitter is for Transmitting Outrage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, on Easter Sunday, news began spreading through <a href=\"http:\/\/search.twitter.com\/search?q=%23amazonfail\">Twitter<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/markprobst.livejournal.com\/15293.html\">LiveJournal<\/a>, and other blogs that Amazon had <a href=\"http:\/\/latimesblogs.latimes.com\/jacketcopy\/2009\/04\/amazon-deranks-gayfriendly-books-the-twitterverse-notices.html\">de-ranked a lot of books that they had deemed &#8220;adult&#8221;<\/a>, in addition removing them from general search results. The majority of those books had little adult content, and the de-listing appeared to be targeting books with GLBT themes.<\/p>\n<p>The response on Twitter especially was vocal and wide-spread. The <a href=\"http:\/\/search.twitter.com\/search?q=%23amazonfail\">#amazonfail hashtag<\/a> has been one of the top trending topics since this time yesterday. Amazon has <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20090413\/ap_on_en_ot\/books_amazon\">claimed that the whole thing was a &#8220;glitch&#8221;<\/a>, but the discussion continues.<\/p>\n<p>About a week ago, graphic designer Jon Engle <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jonengle.com\/2009\/04\/accused\/\">warned people of his experience with StockArt.com<\/a>. They ripped off several of his logos, then turned around and sent him an $18,000 bill for him using his own logos. A <a href=\"http:\/\/search.twitter.com\/search?q=%23savejon\">#savejon<\/a> campaign began on Twitter and elsewhere. His story hit Digg. People began raising money to help Jon defend his work.<\/p>\n<p>Then <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thelogofactory.com.nyud.net\/logo_blog\/index.php\/stock-logos-copyright-twitter\/\">The Logo Factory did some investigating<\/a> and discovered that Jon had most likely been the one lifting logos from StockArt.com. Metafilter posters found out that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.metafilter.com\/80654\/A-logos-worth#2517558\">one of the StockArt.com illustrators had copyrighted his logos in 2001<\/a>, long before Jon uploaded his own logos. Further detective work at the Internet Archive <a href=\"http:\/\/www.metafilter.com\/80654\/A-logos-worth#2517743\">confirmed those earlier dates<\/a>. Even so, the #savejon campaign continued on Twitter for days.<\/p>\n<p>Twitter played a large role in getting the word out in both cases. Moreso than any other social networking site, Twitter is ideally suited for spreading near-contextless outrage. Many Twitter clients include retweet support, where users can re-broadcast a friend&#8217;s post with the click of a button. It&#8217;s much easier than making your own blog post about the subject, and like the classic model of infection, the retweeting spreads from group to group. Tweets&#8217; 140-character limit keeps you from adding much context to your re-posting, keeping information content low.<\/p>\n<p>While large sites like Digg, Reddit, and others can drive a lot of traffic in instances like this, theirs is mainly a first-order effect &#8212; most of the traffic is from them directly. Twitter works on second- and third-order effects, with friends of friends of friends spreading the word.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve seen a lot of argument about what value Twitter provides. Its 140-character limit means you can&#8217;t put much information in your tweets. But it turns out Twitter is well suited for transmitting outrage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, on Easter Sunday, news began spreading through Twitter, LiveJournal, and other blogs that Amazon had de-ranked a lot of books that they had deemed &#8220;adult&#8221;, in addition removing them from general search results. The majority of those books had little adult content, and the de-listing appeared to be targeting books with GLBT themes. The &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/granades.com\/?p=2748\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Twitter is for Transmitting Outrage<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2748"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2748\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2755,"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2748\/revisions\/2755"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/granades.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}