The Evolution of Cute

Posted by Stephen on January 24th, 2006 at 8:49 PM

Originally, children were not cute. It’s not that they were ugly; it’s that they lacked a certain something that made them cute. This resulted in a lot of attrition: when the children would cry or destroy things or in general be unappealing, parents couldn’t say, “Oh, but isn’t he cute when he’s nice?” Instead they’d leave the kids by the side of the road.

Then, eureka! A child was born who was amazingly cute. Imagine the advantage this gave her in survival! Even more amazing, when she grew up and had children of her own, those children were cute. Soon the cute gene ruled supreme, with parents everywhere accosting strangers and demanding that they admire the cuteness of their child.

Related posts

4 Comments »

Comment by anonymous

SO. TRUE.

Posted on January 24, 2006 at 3:19 pm

Comment by olethrosdc

The CUTE and LOUD genes and infanticide through the ages.

Posted on January 24, 2006 at 3:28 pm

Comment by fmi_agent

i’ve had thoughts along these lines too.

could it be instead that babies have always looked the way they have, and human aesthetics/emotions evolved to make us find babies cute? do adult dogs view puppies as adorable? or is that just a human response to ?

in any case, i have to think that flirting behavior by babies did evolve the way you describe it.

Posted on January 24, 2006 at 11:50 pm

Comment by sargentjr

It certainly could be that we adapted to them, but I think the above makes for a funnier story.

Posted on January 25, 2006 at 7:55 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated according to our moderation policy. Sometimes comments are delayed by our spam filter. We try to release them as soon as possible.