<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Procrustean Approach to Science Fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://granades.com/2007/06/22/a-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://granades.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fgranades.com%2F2007%2F06%2F22%2Fa-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=A+Procrustean+Approach+to+Science+Fiction</link>
	<description>Like a blog, but explodier</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://granades.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fgranades.com%2F2007%2F06%2F22%2Fa-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction%2F%23comment-69178&amp;seed_title=A+Procrustean+Approach+to+Science+Fiction#comment-69178</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granades.com/2007/06/22/a-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction/#comment-69178</guid>
		<description>Good entry.  

For good mundane Sci-Fi I've been hyped about Cory Doctorow's stuff lately.  I don't know much about him other than internet rumour (he's more powerful than cthulu, wields a copyright hammer of justice and flying shoes of internet publishing)

I just read  &lt;a href="http://www.radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2007/09/google_fiction_evil_dangerous_surveillance_control_1.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cory Doctorow's Fiction About An Evil Google&lt;/a&gt; (wonder if that link will work) and it falls into the mundane sci-fi category.  However, I agree with your premise, that every time you exclude some sort of writing as "not good enough" you  miss something potentially great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good entry.  </p>
<p>For good mundane Sci-Fi I&#8217;ve been hyped about Cory Doctorow&#8217;s stuff lately.  I don&#8217;t know much about him other than internet rumour (he&#8217;s more powerful than cthulu, wields a copyright hammer of justice and flying shoes of internet publishing)</p>
<p>I just read  <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/from-the-magazine/2007/09/google_fiction_evil_dangerous_surveillance_control_1.php" rel="nofollow">Cory Doctorow&#8217;s Fiction About An Evil Google</a> (wonder if that link will work) and it falls into the mundane sci-fi category.  However, I agree with your premise, that every time you exclude some sort of writing as &#8220;not good enough&#8221; you  miss something potentially great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhatTheCast? :: Episode 11: The Far Side of Indy 4 in Space!</title>
		<link>http://granades.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fgranades.com%2F2007%2F06%2F22%2Fa-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction%2F%23comment-49421&amp;seed_title=A+Procrustean+Approach+to+Science+Fiction#comment-49421</link>
		<dc:creator>WhatTheCast? :: Episode 11: The Far Side of Indy 4 in Space!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granades.com/2007/06/22/a-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction/#comment-49421</guid>
		<description>[...] Science! Stephen talks about the improbability of space colonization. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Science! Stephen talks about the improbability of space colonization. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Nicoll</title>
		<link>http://granades.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fgranades.com%2F2007%2F06%2F22%2Fa-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction%2F%23comment-48812&amp;seed_title=A+Procrustean+Approach+to+Science+Fiction#comment-48812</link>
		<dc:creator>James Nicoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 18:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granades.com/2007/06/22/a-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction/#comment-48812</guid>
		<description>What makes the Mundane SF worse for me is that the people involved clearly don't have the basic knowledge to write the stuff. The post-oil, spring-loaded world was just agonizing to finish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes the Mundane SF worse for me is that the people involved clearly don&#8217;t have the basic knowledge to write the stuff. The post-oil, spring-loaded world was just agonizing to finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyous</title>
		<link>http://granades.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fgranades.com%2F2007%2F06%2F22%2Fa-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction%2F%23comment-48713&amp;seed_title=A+Procrustean+Approach+to+Science+Fiction#comment-48713</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://granades.com/2007/06/22/a-procrustean-approach-to-science-fiction/#comment-48713</guid>
		<description>I'd much rather read a good story than worry about whether it's "mundane" enough.  :P  If the writer can make me *believe* in aliens and FTL travel, they've done their job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much rather read a good story than worry about whether it&#8217;s &#8220;mundane&#8221; enough.  <img src='http://granades.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  If the writer can make me *believe* in aliens and FTL travel, they&#8217;ve done their job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
